3.6.5.3 Main report should bring out the background of the project, its social analysis, details of survey and investigations carried out, ...
3.6.5.3 Main report should bring out the background of the project, its social analysis, details of survey and investigations carried out, analysis of survey and investigation data, traffic studies and demand forecast, rationale of design chosen, cost estimation, economic and financial analysis, sensitivity analysis, project clearances from various agencies for project implementation etc.
3.6.5.4 The Design Report and the Material Report should be detailed as per TOR and among other things, carry a certificate by the consultant that all ground survey, field tests, material tests, soil tests, sub-soil and hydraulic investigations etc. reported and relied upon, have been actually carried out with due diligence. Without this certificate DPR should not be accepted.
3.6.5.5 Cost should be worked out realistically based on correct physical inputs as per data Book of MOST (now MOSRTH) and the prevailing market unit rates of materials and equipment, rates as per State PWD Schedule of Rates applicable to the site, as actually verified and so certified. DPR should not be accepted without a certificate to this effect by the consultant.
3.6.5.6 As mentioned before, estimate should bring out the quantities of principal materials like, cement, steel and bitumen, and give the percentage cost of each of them separately, along with that of other general materials, in relation to the total cost of the work. These percentages will be used in the Price Adjustment Formulae. 3.6.5.7 During entire period of services, the Consultant will continuously interact with the concerned officials of NHAI and provide any clarification as regards methods being followed and carry out any modifications as suggested by NHAI. A prior programme of various activities will be sent to NHAI and prior intimation given regarding start of any key activity such as boring, survey etc. A monthly progress report, for monitoring purpose, will be sent by the consultant to the designated officer of NHAI.
3.6.5.8 The Detailed Project Report (DPR) shall be scrutinised thoroughly for accuracy and soundness by the team leader of the consultant and cross checked by other members of the team. Before final submission to the Employer, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the consultancy firm will certify its correctness under his own signature. 3.7.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for accuracy of the data collected, by him directly or procured from other agencies/authorities, the designs, drawings, estimates and all other details prepared by him as part of these services. He shall indemnify the Authority against any inaccuracy in the work which might surface during implementation of the project. The Consultant will also be responsible for correcting, at his own cost and risk, the drawings including any resurvey/ investigations and correcting layout etc. if required during the execution of the Services.
3.7.2 The Consultant shall be fully responsible for the accuracy of design and drawings of the bridges and structures. The Consultant shall indemnify the Client against any inaccuracy/deficiency in the designs and drawings of the bridges and structures noticed during the construction and even thereafter.
3.8 Peer Review of DPRs and Proof Consultant
3.8.1 For major projects, the feasibility study report and DPR may be got reviewed by a Peer consultant, if considered necessary, to ensure that all the objectives of the project are covered, and that the presentation is consistent with quality, cost and time. For major bridges and complex structures, proof consultants should be appointed. Each part of the report will be reviewed by the consultant including site interaction with PD.
3.8.2 For small works like maintenance etc. review by Peer Consultant may not be necessary.
3.8.3 A panel of retired Officers of Government having the required eligibility will be maintained by Member (Tech). Request for empanelment will be invited through NHAI website on a continuing basis i.e. without any time limit.
3.8.4 In all the cases, the award of the Peer Review works shall be got approved by Member (Technical).
3.8.5 The eligibility criteria for selection of the Peer review consultant shall be as below:
(a) Retired Government Officers of the rank of Chief Engineer and above, with minimum 10 years experience in Highway/Bridges of which at least of 5 years should be at the level of Executive Engineer and above dealing with the Highways and bridges, can be considered as eligible for such assignment.
(b) No age limit is proposed.
3.6.5.5 Cost should be worked out realistically based on correct physical inputs as per data Book of MOST (now MOSRTH) and the prevailing market unit rates of materials and equipment, rates as per State PWD Schedule of Rates applicable to the site, as actually verified and so certified. DPR should not be accepted without a certificate to this effect by the consultant.
3.6.5.6 As mentioned before, estimate should bring out the quantities of principal materials like, cement, steel and bitumen, and give the percentage cost of each of them separately, along with that of other general materials, in relation to the total cost of the work. These percentages will be used in the Price Adjustment Formulae. 3.6.5.7 During entire period of services, the Consultant will continuously interact with the concerned officials of NHAI and provide any clarification as regards methods being followed and carry out any modifications as suggested by NHAI. A prior programme of various activities will be sent to NHAI and prior intimation given regarding start of any key activity such as boring, survey etc. A monthly progress report, for monitoring purpose, will be sent by the consultant to the designated officer of NHAI.
3.6.5.8 The Detailed Project Report (DPR) shall be scrutinised thoroughly for accuracy and soundness by the team leader of the consultant and cross checked by other members of the team. Before final submission to the Employer, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the consultancy firm will certify its correctness under his own signature. 3.7.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for accuracy of the data collected, by him directly or procured from other agencies/authorities, the designs, drawings, estimates and all other details prepared by him as part of these services. He shall indemnify the Authority against any inaccuracy in the work which might surface during implementation of the project. The Consultant will also be responsible for correcting, at his own cost and risk, the drawings including any resurvey/ investigations and correcting layout etc. if required during the execution of the Services.
3.7.2 The Consultant shall be fully responsible for the accuracy of design and drawings of the bridges and structures. The Consultant shall indemnify the Client against any inaccuracy/deficiency in the designs and drawings of the bridges and structures noticed during the construction and even thereafter.
3.8.1 For major projects, the feasibility study report and DPR may be got reviewed by a Peer consultant, if considered necessary, to ensure that all the objectives of the project are covered, and that the presentation is consistent with quality, cost and time. For major bridges and complex structures, proof consultants should be appointed. Each part of the report will be reviewed by the consultant including site interaction with PD.
3.8.2 For small works like maintenance etc. review by Peer Consultant may not be necessary.
3.8.3 A panel of retired Officers of Government having the required eligibility will be maintained by Member (Tech). Request for empanelment will be invited through NHAI website on a continuing basis i.e. without any time limit.
3.8.4 In all the cases, the award of the Peer Review works shall be got approved by Member (Technical).
3.8.5 The eligibility criteria for selection of the Peer review consultant shall be as below:
(a) Retired Government Officers of the rank of Chief Engineer and above, with minimum 10 years experience in Highway/Bridges of which at least of 5 years should be at the level of Executive Engineer and above dealing with the Highways and bridges, can be considered as eligible for such assignment.
(b) No age limit is proposed.
About Banglaweerrbhumi Portwerweral awerwernd wswewere
- [col]
- sdfsdvxc dff rg
- rggdfcvxcg
About Banglaweerrbhumi Portwerweral awerwernd wswewere
- [tab]
- sdfsdvxc dff rg
- Retired Government Officers of the rank of Chief Engineer and above, with minimum 10 years experience in Highway/Bridges of which at least of 5 years should be at the level of Executive Engineer and above dealing with the Highways and bridges, can be considered as eligible for such assignment.
- gdgdkmvcbkl
- For major projects, the feasibility study report and DPR may be got reviewed by a Peer consultant, if considered necessary, to ensure that all the objectives of the project are covered, and that the presentation is consistent with quality, cost and time. For major bridges and complex structures, proof consultants should be appointed. Each part of the report will be reviewed by the consultant
- gfhuyjn
- A panel of retired Officers of Government having the required eligibility will be maintained by Member (Tech). Request for empanelment will be invited through NHAI website on a continuing basis i.e. without any time limit
- ghlmxcbkjjk
- The Detailed Project Report (DPR) shall be scrutinised thoroughly for accuracy and soundness by the team leader of the consultant and cross checked by other members of the team. Before final submission to the Employer, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
| head 1 | head 2 |
|---|---|
| row1 col 1 | row1 col 2 |
| row2 col 1 | row2 col 2 |
| row3 col 1 | row3 col 2 |
COMMENTS